Tension Escalates Between Verydarkman and Apostle Suleman Over US Election Prophecy

A new wave of controversy has erupted between Martins Vincent Otse, better known as Verydarkman (VDM), and Apostle Johnson Suleman, following a series of competing claims about the outcome of the U.S. presidential election. The conflict centers on Suleman’s previous prophecy predicting a female president for the United States, a claim that has since been called into question.

VDM, a vocal critic of religious figures and their prophecies, was quick to respond to Apostle Suleman’s earlier statement. The cleric had boldly claimed that a woman would soon become president of the U.S., a prediction that VDM deemed as inaccurate. “Prophecies don’t change like that, only predictions change,” VDM argued, dismissing the prediction as vague and not rooted in the certainty of prophecy. He also pointed out the difference between prophecy and prediction, suggesting that Suleman’s earlier claim could be categorized as a prediction rather than a divine prophecy.

Just hours after VDM’s criticism, a new video surfaced online in which Apostle Suleman seemingly doubled down on his prophetic assertions. This time, the cleric predicted that former President Donald Trump would win the next U.S. election. In the video, Suleman referenced an assassination attempt on Trump during his campaign, claiming it only served to galvanize more support for the controversial figure. “The attempt to assassinate Trump made more people support him,” he stated confidently, implying that Trump’s political prospects were strengthened by the incident.

The new video further fueled the tension between the two figures, with VDM taking to social media to offer a sharp response. He ridiculed the cleric’s revisionist statement, referring to it as an attempt at damage control. “Tell that apostle that prophecies don’t change like that only predictions change… remove that damage control from your page my Edo brother,” VDM said, referring to Suleman’s roots in Edo State, Nigeria. His comments underscored his skepticism toward Suleman’s shifting predictions and his frustration with what he sees as an attempt to save face after the earlier misfire.

The back-and-forth between VDM and Apostle Suleman has sparked a wider debate about the accuracy and legitimacy of prophecies made by religious leaders, especially in the context of high-profile political events like the U.S. presidential race. Critics argue that such prophecies often blur the line between spiritual insight and speculative predictions, which can mislead followers when they fail to materialize. VDM, known for his outspoken stance against what he calls “false prophets,” has consistently challenged such claims, encouraging his followers to question the authenticity of public religious prophecies.

On the other hand, Suleman’s supporters remain steadfast in their belief in his spiritual abilities. They point to his long history of prophecies and assert that even if some predictions do not come true immediately, the broader message and intent are still valuable. Suleman himself has not directly responded to VDM’s latest criticism but continues to share his prophetic visions with his global audience.