Looters List: Court Orders FG, Lai Mohammed To Pay Uche Secondus N20m
Reprieve came the way of the National Chairman of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Prince Uche Secondus on Thursday, as a Rivers State High Court sitting in Port Harcourt ordered the Minister of information, Lai Mohammad and the federal government to pay a sum of N20 million damages in a defamation suit filed against them by the PDP Chairman.
The Chief Judge of Rivers State, Justice Adama Iyayi-Lamikanra, in a judgment delivered during a virtual court sitting, explained that Secondus successfully proved his case that the defendants jointly and severally defamed him by publishing his name on the looters’ list in 2018.
Recall that the PDP Chairman had featured in a March 2018 publication containing names of some Nigerians which the Minister of Information and Culture had claimed looted the country’s treasury.
In reaction, Secondus, through a pre-action letter by his lawyer, Emeka Etiaba (SAN), demanded the retraction of the publication as well as a payment of N1.5bn damages to him within 72 hours, failing which he threatened to go to court.
He later filed a libel suit marked PHC/1013/2018 against Mohammed and the Federal Government, urging the court to declare that the respondents defamed him by putting his name on the looters’ list.
Justice Adama on Thursday entered judgment in Secondus’ favour and awarded N20m in damages against the defendants.
Exposed!! Popular Abuja doctor revealed how men can naturally and permanently cure poor erection, quick ejaculation, small and shameful manhood without side effects. Even if you are hypertensive or diabetic . Stop the use of hard drugs for sex!! It kills!
The judgement read, “The claimant’s case succeeds and the defendants are jointly and severally liable for the libelous publication made against the claimant.
“The 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants shall publish a written apology in favour of the claimant in the newspaper of the 3rd defendant.”
“an order of injunction restraining the defendants whether by themselves, agents or privies from further publishing defamatory statements against the claimant.”he said.
